Which statement best describes the progression from scent box training to furniture training?

• A. Scent box training uses only one odor; furniture training uses multiple odors.
• B. Scent box training is used to train scent discrimination; furniture training uses odor targeting.
• C. Scent box training contains the odor and shapes a response; furniture training shifts target to the odor itself.
• D. They are the same training with different names.

Answer: (C)

The main idea is the shift from using a container as the cue to using the odor itself as the cue. In scent box training, the odor is placed inside a box, and the dog learns to respond to that odor within the box, with the trainer reinforcing the box-based indication. This builds a reliable, shaped response to the scent in a controlled setup. Furniture training moves the target to the odor itself and places it on actual furniture or objects in a real environment, so the dog must indicate the scent source without relying on the box as a cue. This transition strengthens generalization and ensures the dog can locate odors in practical settings, not just in the box.

The other statements don’t capture that shift in what the dog is targeting. It’s not primarily about one odor versus many, nor a simple discrimination versus targeting distinction, and it isn’t just a different name for the same process.